Da tu apoyo a Chisland! Desactiva tu bloqueador de publicidad o haz una donación para el mantenimiento del foro! Cualquier cifra vale, puedes leer más información aquí


Igualdad

1646647649651652684

Comentarios

  • La "cultura islamica" es como cualquier cultura algo temporal, hace varios siglos la "cultura cristiana" implicaba mas o menos lo mismo, cambio, o la hicieron cambiar, y ahora a ningun cristiano se le ocurre pedir la pena de muerte a un sodomita, al menos en publico.

    Meloni acierta en dejar claro que hay comportamientos incompatibles con la civilizacion europea, y que esto lo tenga que decir una señora que esta en contra del matrimonio igualitario refleja lo perdida que esta la izquierda, pero se equivoca, muy intencionadamente, en imputar a cualquier musulman un integrismo religioso que en todo caso es consecuencia de una educacion y de un contexto social, que Europa tiene derecho a cambiar sin cambiar la religion.
  • editado 29 de marzo PM



    El Estados Islámico llama a perpetrar atentados contra civiles en toda Europa.



  • Ayer: "dónde vas con esa barba a decir que te sientes mujer" y hoy esto. Que se aclaren, si pueden.
  • dynamic escribió : »


    Ayer: "dónde vas con esa barba a decir que te sientes mujer" y hoy esto. Que se aclaren, si pueden.

    Cuando a las patologías les dar poder sobre la sociedad.

  • dynamic escribió : »


    Ayer: "dónde vas con esa barba a decir que te sientes mujer" y hoy esto. Que se aclaren, si pueden.

    Es que depende de a quien creen que vota. No hay más.
  • editado 31 de marzo PM


    Cultivando el odio, la discriminación y la segregación de género, desde el poder de los medios y el estado. Los nuevos nazis que deben ser combatidos por toda la gente de bien.



    Me da miedo tener un hijo varón en España, porque sería una persona disminuida en derechos y estigmatizada.



  • Muy favorable de que se viole a más hombres para que haya igualdad.

    Pd Es tierno que eche de menos los chistes de Arévalo, pero puede seguir a UTBH.
  • editado 2 de abril PM
    dynamic escribió : »


    Los barceloneses hemos descubierto el porno en 2023.

    El único rasgo que debemos considerar es que son cometidas por hombres heterosexuales. Que nadie que no sea parte del gobierno de progreso vaya más allá.

  • ¿Es una aberración ver a un hombre como un hombre? Los progres han convertido al mundo en una distopia.

  • Inapelable

    https://x.com/jk_rowling/status/1776616861888655835
    You’ve asked me several questions on this thread and accused me of avoiding answering, so here goes.

    I believe a woman is a human being who belongs to the sex class that produces large gametes. It’s irrelevant whether or not her gametes have ever been fertilised, whether or not she’s carried a baby to term, irrelevant if she was born with a rare difference of sexual development that makes neither of the above possible, or if she’s aged beyond being able to produce viable eggs. She is a woman and just as much a woman as the others.

    I don’t believe a woman is more or less of a woman for having sex with men, women, both or not wanting sex at all. I don’t think a woman is more or less of a woman for having a buzz cut and liking suits and ties, or wearing stilettos and mini dresses, for being black, white or brown, for being six feet tall or a little person, for being kind or cruel, angry or sad, loud or retiring. She isn't more of a woman for featuring in Playboy or being a surrendered wife, nor less of a woman for designing space rockets or taking up boxing. What makes her a woman is the fact of being born in a body that, assuming nothing has gone wrong in her physical development (which, as stated above, still doesn't stop her being a woman), is geared towards producing eggs as opposed to sperm, towards bearing as opposed to begetting children, and irrespective of whether she's done either of those things, or ever wants to.

    Womanhood isn't a mystical state of being, nor is it measured by how well one apes sex stereotypes. We are not the creatures either porn or the Bible tell you we are. Femaleness is not, as trans woman Andrea Chu Long wrote, ‘an open mouth, an expectant asshole, blank, blank eyes,’ nor are we God’s afterthought, sprung from Adam’s rib.

    Women are provably subject to certain experiences because of our female bodies, including different forms of oppression, depending on the cultures in which we live. When trans activists say 'I thought you didn't want to be defined by your biology,' it’s a feeble and transparent attempt at linguistic sleight of hand. Women don't want to be limited, exploited, punished, or subject to other unjust treatment because of their biology, but our being female is indeed defined by our biology. It's one material fact about us, like having freckles or disliking beetroot, neither of which are representative of our entire beings, either. Women have billions of different personalities and life stories, which have nothing to do with our bodies, although we are likely to have had experiences men don't and can't, because we belong to our sex class.

    Some people feel strongly that they should have been, or wish to be seen as, the sex class into which they weren't born. Gender dysphoria is a real and very painful condition and I feel nothing but sympathy for anyone who suffers from it. I want them to be free to dress and present themselves however they like and I want them to have exactly the same rights as every other citizen regarding housing, employment and personal safety. I do not, however, believe that surgeries and cross-sex hormones literally turn a person into the opposite sex, nor do I believe in the idea that each of us has a nebulous ‘gender identity’ that may or might not match our sexed bodies. I believe the ideology that preaches those tenets has caused, and continues to cause, very real harm to vulnerable people.

    I am strongly against women's and girls' rights and protections being dismantled to accommodate trans-identified men, for the very simple reason that no study has ever demonstrated that trans-identified men don't have exactly the same pattern of criminality as other men, and because, however they identify, men retain their advantages of speed and strength. In other words, I think the safety and rights of girls and women are more important than those men's desire for validation.

    I sincerely hope that answers your questions. You may still disagree, but as I hope this shows, I’m more than happy to have this debate.
  • Solo matizaria que si un transexual, aka persona con disforia de género, quiere hormonarse y/o cirugía está en su derecho, menores con muchos matices, y que deberían poder ser tratadas legalmente con el sexo elegido, con matices para no perjudicar otros derechos.

    El problema actual no viene por las personas transexuales sino por la idea que el sexo biológico no existe, que perjudica a las mujeres.
  • editado 7 de abril PM


    "for the very simple reason that no study has ever demonstrated that trans-identified men don't have exactly the same pattern of criminality as other men"

    Ya saben, no hay estudio que demuestre que los trans no tengan la misma naturaleza criminal que poseen por naturaleza los otros hombres. Las mujeres tienen derecho de protegerse de esos criminales, de esos negros, judíos y varones criminales en esencia.

    Que puto asco los que validan esa puta mierda neonazi de una criminalidad por naturaleza, del feminazismo.



  • tricky2k escribió : »
    Inapelable

    https://x.com/jk_rowling/status/1776616861888655835
    You’ve asked me several questions on this thread and accused me of avoiding answering, so here goes.

    I believe a woman is a human being who belongs to the sex class that produces large gametes. It’s irrelevant whether or not her gametes have ever been fertilised, whether or not she’s carried a baby to term, irrelevant if she was born with a rare difference of sexual development that makes neither of the above possible, or if she’s aged beyond being able to produce viable eggs. She is a woman and just as much a woman as the others.

    I don’t believe a woman is more or less of a woman for having sex with men, women, both or not wanting sex at all. I don’t think a woman is more or less of a woman for having a buzz cut and liking suits and ties, or wearing stilettos and mini dresses, for being black, white or brown, for being six feet tall or a little person, for being kind or cruel, angry or sad, loud or retiring. She isn't more of a woman for featuring in Playboy or being a surrendered wife, nor less of a woman for designing space rockets or taking up boxing. What makes her a woman is the fact of being born in a body that, assuming nothing has gone wrong in her physical development (which, as stated above, still doesn't stop her being a woman), is geared towards producing eggs as opposed to sperm, towards bearing as opposed to begetting children, and irrespective of whether she's done either of those things, or ever wants to.

    Womanhood isn't a mystical state of being, nor is it measured by how well one apes sex stereotypes. We are not the creatures either porn or the Bible tell you we are. Femaleness is not, as trans woman Andrea Chu Long wrote, ‘an open mouth, an expectant asshole, blank, blank eyes,’ nor are we God’s afterthought, sprung from Adam’s rib.

    Women are provably subject to certain experiences because of our female bodies, including different forms of oppression, depending on the cultures in which we live. When trans activists say 'I thought you didn't want to be defined by your biology,' it’s a feeble and transparent attempt at linguistic sleight of hand. Women don't want to be limited, exploited, punished, or subject to other unjust treatment because of their biology, but our being female is indeed defined by our biology. It's one material fact about us, like having freckles or disliking beetroot, neither of which are representative of our entire beings, either. Women have billions of different personalities and life stories, which have nothing to do with our bodies, although we are likely to have had experiences men don't and can't, because we belong to our sex class.

    Some people feel strongly that they should have been, or wish to be seen as, the sex class into which they weren't born. Gender dysphoria is a real and very painful condition and I feel nothing but sympathy for anyone who suffers from it. I want them to be free to dress and present themselves however they like and I want them to have exactly the same rights as every other citizen regarding housing, employment and personal safety. I do not, however, believe that surgeries and cross-sex hormones literally turn a person into the opposite sex, nor do I believe in the idea that each of us has a nebulous ‘gender identity’ that may or might not match our sexed bodies. I believe the ideology that preaches those tenets has caused, and continues to cause, very real harm to vulnerable people.

    I am strongly against women's and girls' rights and protections being dismantled to accommodate trans-identified men, for the very simple reason that no study has ever demonstrated that trans-identified men don't have exactly the same pattern of criminality as other men, and because, however they identify, men retain their advantages of speed and strength. In other words, I think the safety and rights of girls and women are more important than those men's desire for validation.

    I sincerely hope that answers your questions. You may still disagree, but as I hope this shows, I’m more than happy to have this debate.

    +1000
  • tricky2k escribió : »
    Inapelable

    https://x.com/jk_rowling/status/1776616861888655835

    I believe a woman is a human being who belongs to the sex class that produces large gametes.


    La Rowling for president
  • editado 7 de abril PM

    El 99% de lo dicho por Harry Potter es correcto. Pero lo echa a perder en dos líneas, cuando habla de una criminalidad innata en el hombre.

  • Trump, principal responsable político que el aborto no sea un derecho en USA, acaba de anunciar su plan para frenar su agujero electoral entre las mujeres, será cada estado quien decida si el aborto es legal o ilegal, traducido abortar será delito siempre en Carolina del Sur, y será legal siempre en NY, electoralmente puede irle bien, pero deja en ridículo los argumentos "éticos", "morales" o "religiosos" de los antiabortistas trumpistas, "asesinar" está bien dependiendo de donde vivas.
  • editado 11 de abril PM

    Nada nuevo, siempre ha sido su posición, y por ese lado ha recibido criticas. Sin embargo eso resulta pragmáticamente mejor, a que ser permita libremente en toda la federación.
    De hecho, eso fue lo decidido por la Corte Suprema de Justicia, que cada estado federal decidiera sobre el tema, y no el poder centralizado, como era antes, que permitía el aborto a nivel nacional.
  • Pragmatismo electoral, ultraderechista cobarde, millones de niños, perdón, embriones, asesinados legalmente para sacar unos puntos más en las elecciones.

    Políticamente es inteligente, pero seguir usando argumentos morales quedará muy cínico. :awesome:
  • Es un nothinburger. El Tribunal Supremo ya dejó claro que el aborto es una cuestión de los estados, así que no hay mucho más que hacer a nivel federal.

    La alternativa es aprobar una enmienda constitucional por el Congreso que regule las circunstancias en las que se puede abortar, que además tienen que aprobar tres cuartas partes de los estados. No existe esa mayoría republicana ni demócrata.
  • Siempre me sorprende que Gascón publique en El País, demasiado sensato.

    Mi sensación es que el mundo vuelve de un "exceso" en todo lo trans, cuando nosotros vamos con entusiasmo.
Accede o Regístrate para comentar.